|

|
LEGISLATIVE GUIDE
We need
legislators to know about the problems at the LSBPIE.
Coming soon, you will be able to click here and get a
punch list as to what we need you to do! |
|
WHY WAS THIS SITE MADE?
When
Representative Mert Smiley first suggested in his
legislative hearing last April that he might want to
combine the services of the LSBPIE under another board
as a cost savings measure, many of us opposed that
concept. We recognized that there were problems
but incoming Chairman
John Mowell promised change and an
open forum like we had never seen before. We fell
for it hook, line and sinker and the changes that were
promised actually created less open communication.
CHANGE MUST
COME and upon reflection, it would appear that the
LSBPIE believes that they can do whatever they want,
whenever they want, regardless of the rules or the law.
COMPLAINTS
WERE FILED, but we believe that the best chance for
change is with the legislative session and will propose
two bills, one to change the make up of this board and
the other to abolish it and place its duties under the
scope and authority of another governmental entity.
KNOWLEDGE
IS THE KEY
|
|

.
Because the volume of information that has been
uncovered is so much, this site is an ever changing
project and will be updated often. Our initial
focus was to just get live, but you will find that
documentation will be added soon. Please check
back!
|
|

IS THIS SITE A BULLY SITE?
What is
cyber stalking and is what you read on this site
considered stalking?
READ THE LAW
Cyber stalking
laws do not apply to any peaceable, nonviolent, or non
threatening activity intended to express political views
or to provide lawful information to others.
While this
site may be colorful, and is intended to express
outrage, nothing contained herein threatens harm to
anyone. The authors feel as if we have been taken
advantage of and we want a change in the law!
ITS ABOUT FREE
SPEECH
|
.
THIS SITE IS A POLITICAL COMMENTARY
SITE
NO THREATS OR HARM TO ANYONE IS BEING MADE
IT IS INTENDED TO EDUCATE LEGISLATORS AS TO THE PROBLEMS THAT
WE SEE WITH THE WAY THE LSBPIE IS BEING OPERATED!
|

Some
would say that the Louisiana State Board of Private
Investigator Examiners operates under the assumption
that the law does not apply; that they are the final
authority in all matters with regard to the private
investigators.
But
the reality of the situation is that the Statues defined
the LAW and the Board is required to follow the law.
Take
these examples:
-
The
statue requires the money to be deposited in the general
fund for the State of Louisiana. The board
operates it's own accounts.
-
The
statue states that if the applicant is a corporation,
they shall be in good standing with the Secretary of
State. This requirement is loosely enforced.
PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR LAW
The
statues were passed by the legislative branch and became
law.
RULES AND REGULATIONS
The
Rules and Regulations are made up by the State Board and
then following a procedure, must be promulgated into a
published rule according to the Administrative Rules.
R.S. 37:3524
The adoption of
any rule or regulation, guideline, substantive
procedure, or code of conduct by the board shall be
subject to the provisions of the Administrative
Procedure Act; however, such rules shall be subject to
legislative oversight by the House and Senate
Committees on Commerce.
§518. Continuing
Education
A. Each
licensed private investigator is required to complete
a minimum of eight hours of approved investigative
educational instruction within the one-year period
immediately prior to renewal in order to qualify for a
renewal license.
B. Each
licensed private investigator is required to complete
and return the LSBPIE continuing educational
compliance form with the request for license renewal
each year. The form shall be signed under penalty of
perjury and shall include documentation of each hour
of approved investigation educational instruction
completed.
C. Any
licensee who wishes to apply for an extension of time
to complete educational instruction requirements must
submit a letter of request setting forth reasons for
the extension request to the Executive Director of the
LSBPIE thirty days prior to license renewal. The
training committee shall rule on each request. If an
extension is granted, the investigator shall be
granted 30 days to complete the required hours. Hours
completed during a 30-day extension shall only apply
to the previous year.
THERE IS
NOTHING IN THE LAW OR THE RULES THAT WOULD ALLOW THE
STATE BOARD THE RIGHT TO JUST CHANGE SOMETHING WITHOUT
FOLLOWING THE PROCEDURE. AND THAT IS WHY WE SAY
THEY VIOLATED THE LAW!
JOURNEYMAN
PROMULGATION PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL
January 2010
April 2010
|
|
First Amendment: An Overview
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution
protects the right to freedom of religion and freedom of
expression from government interference. See U.S. Const.
amend. I. Freedom of expression consists of the rights
to freedom of speech, press, assembly and to petition
the government for a redress of grievances, and the
implied rights of association and belief. The Supreme
Court interprets the extent of the protection afforded
to these rights. The First Amendment has been
interpreted by the Court as applying to the entire
federal government even though it is only expressly
applicable to Congress. Furthermore, the Court has
interpreted, the due process clause of the Fourteenth
Amendment as protecting the rights in the First
Amendment from interference by state governments. See
U.S. Const. amend. XIV.
Two clauses in the First Amendment guarantee freedom of
religion. The establishment clause prohibits the
government from passing legislation to establish an
official religion or preferring one religion over
another. It enforces the "separation of church and
state." Some governmental activity related to religion
has been declared constitutional by the Supreme Court.
For example, providing bus transportation for parochial
school students and the enforcement of "blue laws" is
not prohibited. The free exercise clause prohibits the
government, in most instances, from interfering with a
person's practice of their religion.
The most basic component of freedom of expression is the
right of freedom of speech. The right to freedom of
speech allows individuals to express themselves without
interference or constraint by the government. The
Supreme Court requires the government to provide
substantial justification for the interference with the
right of free speech where it attempts to regulate the
content of the speech. A less stringent test is applied
for content-neutral legislation. The Supreme Court has
also recognized that the government may prohibit some
speech that may cause a breach of the peace or cause
violence. For more on unprotected and less protected
categories of speech see advocacy of illegal action,
fighting words, commercial speech and obscenity. The
right to free speech includes other mediums of
expression that communicate a message. The level of
protection speech receives also depends on the forum in
which it takes place.
Despite popular misunderstanding the right to freedom of
the press guaranteed by the first amendment is not very
different from the right to freedom of speech. It allows
an individual to express themselves through publication
and dissemination. It is part of the constitutional
protection of freedom of expression. It does not afford
members of the media any special rights or privileges
not afforded to citizens in general.
The right to assemble allows people to gather for
peaceful and lawful purposes. Implicit within this right
is the right to association and belief. The Supreme
Court has expressly recognized that a right to freedom
of association and belief is implicit in the First,
Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments. This implicit right is
limited to the right to associate for First Amendment
purposes. It does not include a right of social
association. The government may prohibit people from
knowingly associating in groups that engage and promote
illegal activities. The right to associate also
prohibits the government from requiring a group to
register or disclose its members or from denying
government benefits on the basis of an individual's
current or past membership in a particular group. There
are exceptions to this rule where the Court finds that
governmental interests in disclosure/registration
outweigh interference with first amendment rights. The
government may also, generally, not compel individuals
to express themselves, hold certain beliefs, or belong
to particular associations or groups.
The right to petition the government for a redress of
grievances guarantees people the right to ask the
government to provide relief for a wrong through the
courts (litigation) or other governmental action. It
works with the right of assembly by allowing people to
join together and seek change from the government.
|
CHANGE BEGINS WITH ME
|